|Print this story||Permalink|
It pays to live in Park Slope.
Residents in the tony brownstone neighborhood pay less than half as much in property taxes than neighborhoods in Southeast Brooklyn, this paper has learned.
The startling disparity was brought to light by Mill Basin realtor Edie Okun, who first noticed the inequitable pattern when her firm recently sold a property in Park Slope.
“We said, ‘Why the hell are those taxes so cheap,’” she recalled.
Okun and her business partner poured through city data, comparing residential real estate taxes in Park Slope to neighborhoods like Georgetown, Mill Basin and Canarsie.
The owner of a residential property with a market valued of $1.3 million at on Lincoln Place pay $6,435 a year in taxes. A comparative property on East 59th Street valued at $495,000 pays $14,788, city records show.
A Bergen Street home valued at $1.3 million pay $3,908 in real estate taxes, while a comparative home on Ralph Avenue with a market value of $685,000 paid $6,223.
And the list goes on, Okun said. “We are paying double and sometimes three times as much.”
The city’s Department of Finance, the agency that assesses property values and collects real estate taxes, among other duties, confirmed the disparity.
According to the agency, when the property tax law was adopted by the state in 1981, Park Slope properties had lower assessed values than properties in other areas.
While real estate values in Park Slope skyrocketed, the base, assessed values remained fairly low. And real estate taxes are based on assessed value—not market value.
For small homes, assessments – not market values – may not increase more than six percent in one year and 20 percent over five years. For four to 10 unit properties, assessments may not increase by more than eight percent in one year and 30 percent over five years. There is no cap on market values.
The purpose of these limits and phase-ins is to protect owners from steep tax increases that would result from changes in market value.
But assessment caps can also create inequities because market values in and within neighborhoods change by different percentages, but the assessment caps are the same for all owners, the agency said. As a result of these assessment caps, assessed values did not keep pace with market value changes.
“Now the question is, what is to be done about this,” said Assemblymember Alan Maisel, who represents neighborhoods in southeast Brooklyn.
“The city of New York is going to have to address this issue,” the state lawmaker continued. “It’s an inequity that should not stand.”
“Basically, what it means is that the people in this part of Brooklyn are subsidizing the folks in Park Slope—because they are not paying their fair share,” Maisel said. “It just doesn’t make sense.”
Councilmember Lew Fidler, who represents areas of southeast Brooklyn, called the disparity “an injustice.”
“It’s something we have to get right, just out of essential fairness,” the city lawmaker said.
“I’m not looking to punish the property owners in park Slope, but come on, we are entitled to a fair shake,” Fidler continued.
Fidler said he has dispatched a letter to Finance, seeking a reasoned explanation.
“Their ought to be some way of correcting this at least, particularly with the new transfer of a property,” he said.
Ken Freeman, a realtor and president of the Park Slope Civic Council, said there is no cabal.
“I am far from an expert in this, but I’m sure there’s a mathematical explanation,” he said. “Taxes are not a policy determination, that someone is showing some kind of favoritism to Park Slope.”
Okun, a Georgetown resident, said she hopes shedding light on the matter might will bring some measure of equity to homeowners who described as “middle class working people.”
Asked if she would be as vigilant if she lived in Park Slope, Okun had this to say: “I think everyone should be paying the same. But probably not. I’m not a saint.”
©2008 Community Newspaper Group
|Print this story||Permalink|
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not BrooklynDaily.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynDaily.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.