Coney Island residents criticize plan to light up iconic Parachute Jump ride

Residents: Use the money to repair libraries and post offices

Brooklyn Daily
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Daily on Facebook.

The city wants to spend $2 million to illuminate Coney Island’s iconic Parachute Jump, but some residents say they would rather see the money used to keep the lights on in communities left powerless by Hurricane Sandy.

“This is like buying a Cadillac when you can’t afford a bicycle,” former Community Board 13 member Todd Dobrin said about the city’s Parks Department’s decision to add more bling to the 73-year-old landmark.

Dobrin said the money Borough President Markowitz allocated to the project would be better used to restore library, police, postal, and other services in Coney Island, Seagate, Brighton Beach, and Manhattan Beach — a move some meeting attendees cheered.

“How in good conscience can money be put into something that is very attractive and would be a tourist draw, when we’re going to get clobbered here?” said Brighton Beach activist Ida Sanoff.

CB 13’s Parks and Recreation disagreed with Dobrin and Sanoff, voting in favor of allowing Luna Park owner Central Amusements International to oversee the light installation.

Since the summer, Central Amusements has been promoting its plan to spark up the Parachute Jump, winning over Coney stakeholders with a video showing how they plan to illuminate the ride with dancing LED lights synchronized with the brilliant beams of its Scream Zone.

Markowitz called for the ride to be returned to its glimmering glory in his February State of the Borough address, vowing an inter-galactic shimmer-fest would be underway before he leaves office next year.

“We’ll relight the Parachute Jump with enough bling so it can be seen from outer space,” he said.

Opponents to the plan said board approval was inevitable since its members were handpicked by Markowitz, Councilmen Domenic Recchia (D–Coney Island) and Mike Nelson (D–Brighton Beach).

“The people who appointed them want them to pass it,” said Brighton Beach resident Arlene Brenner. “I resent $2 million being spent on lights when there is so much need in the community.”

Yet committee members stuck to their guns.

“This is about making Coney Island beautiful,” said committee co-chairwoman Barbara Teitelbaum. “I’m not being paid here.”

Others said the money Markowitz earmarked for the project probably can’t be used for anything else.

“If you took it away from the project, you’d never see that money,” said board member Marty Levine.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Daily on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

sal from coney island says:
At the CB 13 meeting last Wednesday ( Nov. 28) , Councilman Recchia told the crowd that over $ 300 million was moved around in the Council to address the needs of the aftermath of Sandy.
So evidently , even the $ 2 million can be moved around to get what we need in Coney Island.You are wrong Marty Levine.
We need infrastructure Not VANITY Projects , that are in BP Marty Markowitz Bucket List. Recchia told the Cb crowd that in 2016 the infrastructure projects will start. And he wants to be the NEW BP of Brooklyn. What a laugh !
The City council & BP Markowitz already
wasted over $1.45 million of taxpayer monies for the first lighting project of the Parachute Jump back in 2006.
And by the way to get to this second lighting project of the Parachute jump NYEDC already wasted over $ 4 million in consulting & design fees. That they didn't tell us at this meeting.
People are fed up with this political basa.
Dec. 5, 2012, 12:13 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!