Coney Island and Brighton Beach activists call for dunes, but government groups say they are unnecessary

Sandy survivors say city leaving them low and wet by not protecting beachfront

Brooklyn Daily
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Experts be damned!

The city needs to build sand dunes off Brooklyn’s beach-lined shorefront to shield residents from the next Hurricane Sandy-like storm — just like it is to doing for the Rockaways in Queens — claim residents who fear the city’s fix is a recipe for disaster.

Residents of Sandy-slammed Coney Island and Brighton Beach say they need a fast, efficient barrier to block rising ocean waters in the event of another storm, and argue that dunes are the perfect fix.

“Dunes have been proven effective, they’re cost-effective, and they can be built relatively quickly,” said coastal watchdog Ida Sanoff, executive director of the Natural Resources Protective Association.

Locals said that the city’s determination to continue development along the shoreline of the Coney Island peninsula — rather than retreating from vulnerable areas, as it’s doing in parts of Staten Island — increases the need for urgent protective measures.

“We need something to prevent the water from just coming in like it did before,” said Coney Island community leader Sheila Smalls. “They want to build all these things near the beach, but they aren’t doing anything to protect them.”

The current city plan focuses on preventing overflow from the Coney Island Creek — by filling in the toxic inlet and turning it into a marsh. But dune-advocates argue that proposal will take too long to approve and complete, and anyway would do nothing to prevent seawater from reaching all the way up Ocean Parkway to Avenue Y, as it did during Sandy.

“It’s going to take years, perhaps decades, for those plans to get funded and go through the review precesses,” said Sanoff.

The longtime Brighton Beach activist pointed out that artificial dunes are typically seeded with vegetation to prevent erosion, and suggested that the real reason Coney and Brighton are not getting the same protection as the Queens peninsula is a worry that seagrass-covered dunes might block views from the amusement area.

“When tourists come to Coney Island and they’re up on the Boardwalk, they want to see the ocean,” Sanoff said. “I’m very happy that tourists want to come to Coney Island, but I think the safety of the people who live here is more important.”

But the city argued that the Rockaways suffer from greater exposure to storms, since that peninsula lies directly on the Atlantic Ocean and experiences much stronger waves.

“It’s not a one-size-fits-all thing along the coast,” said a spokesman for the Mayor’s office.

The Army Corps of Engineers, which is constructing the Queens dunes, pointed out that it has already dumped thousands of tons of new sand on Brooklyn’s beaches in the aftermath of the storm to create a greater buffer, and noted that Coney Island’s beach sits 13 feet above sea level — as high as most dunes.

“It’s like a dune that’s 100 feet wide,” a Corps spokesman said.

But Sanoff countered that the beach’s height failed to stop the storm surge during Sandy — and argued that wind and water will soon erode the fresh sand dumped this year, just as it has in the past.

“It’s just going to blow away,” Sanoff said.

Updated 9:01 pm, November 25, 2013
Reach reporter Will Bredderman at or by calling (718) 260-4507. Follow him at
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

sal from coney island says:
At least there's one person looking out for the Shoreline Protection for the residents of Seagate , Coney island, Brighton Beach & Manhattan Beach.

That's more than the cronies that are on the NY Rising Planning Committee.

Keep up the great environmental activism that you are doing Ida Sanoff.
Nov. 25, 2013, 10 am
Sheila smalls from Coney Island says:
I agree with Ida if you are using public funds, then the public should be able to use that beach, They have some nerve and this issue needs to be addressed by the elected official who will oversee these funds to make public use mandatory, they want to use public funds yet stay private, where they do that at?
Dec. 3, 2013, 6:39 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!